↓ Skip to main content

Great spotted woodpecker (Dendrocopos major) and red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) prefer different cone features of European larch (Larix decidua)

Overview of attention for article published in Biologia, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Great spotted woodpecker (Dendrocopos major) and red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) prefer different cone features of European larch (Larix decidua)
Published in
Biologia, January 2019
DOI 10.2478/s11756-018-00181-z
Authors

Łukasz Dylewski, Łukasz Myczko

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 25%
Researcher 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Unknown 5 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2019.
All research outputs
#14,784,238
of 24,780,938 outputs
Outputs from Biologia
#247
of 431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,492
of 448,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biologia
#10
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,780,938 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.