You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The incidence, aetiology, and adverse clinical consequences of less severe diarrhoeal episodes among infants and children residing in low-income and middle-income countries: a 12-month case-control study as a follow-on to the Global Enteric Multicenter Study (GEMS)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet Global Health, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s2214-109x(19)30076-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karen L Kotloff, Dilruba Nasrin, William C Blackwelder, Yukun Wu, Tamer Farag, Sandra Panchalingham, Samba O Sow, Dipika Sur, Anita K M Zaidi, Abu S G Faruque, Debasish Saha, Pedro L Alonso, Boubou Tamboura, Doh Sanogo, Uma Onwuchekwa, Byomkesh Manna, Thandavarayan Ramamurthy, Suman Kanungo, Shahnawaz Ahmed, Shahida Qureshi, Farheen Quadri, Anowar Hossain, Sumon K Das, Martin Antonio, M Jahangir Hossain, Inacio Mandomando, Sozinho Acácio, Kousick Biswas, Sharon M Tennant, Jaco J Verweij, Halvor Sommerfelt, James P Nataro, Roy M Robins-Browne, Myron M Levine |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Armenia | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 305 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 305 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 43 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 53 | 17% |
| Unknown | 99 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 55 | 18% |
| Unknown | 116 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2024.
All research outputs
#4,540,361
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Global Health
#2,001
of 3,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,385
of 364,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Global Health
#71
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.