↓ Skip to main content

Candida albicans induces mucosal bacterial dysbiosis that promotes invasive infection

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Pathogens, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
46 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Candida albicans induces mucosal bacterial dysbiosis that promotes invasive infection
Published in
PLoS Pathogens, April 2019
DOI 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007717
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martinna Bertolini, Amit Ranjan, Angela Thompson, Patricia I. Diaz, Takanori Sobue, Kendra Maas, Anna Dongari-Bagtzoglou

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 188 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 14%
Student > Bachelor 26 14%
Researcher 23 12%
Student > Master 20 11%
Other 11 6%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 52 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 21 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 61 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,198,684
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Pathogens
#1,093
of 9,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,813
of 364,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Pathogens
#20
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.