| Title |
Intestinal Microbiota in Cardiovascular Health and Disease JACC State-of-the-Art Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.024 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
W.H. Wilson Tang, Fredrik Bäckhed, Ulf Landmesser, Stanley L. Hazen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 109 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 17 | 16% |
| United States | 16 | 15% |
| Australia | 4 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Chile | 3 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 49 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 69 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 18% |
| Scientists | 13 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 324 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 324 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 12% |
| Researcher | 36 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 51 | 16% |
| Unknown | 112 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 34 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 33 | 10% |
| Unknown | 133 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2021.
All research outputs
#564,314
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,430
of 16,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,655
of 365,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#58
of 399 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 399 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.