Title |
Child Health Promotion in Underserved Communities The FAMILIA Trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
JACC, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.057 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rodrigo Fernandez-Jimenez, Risa Jaslow, Sameer Bansilal, Maribel Santana, Raquel Diaz-Munoz, Jacqueline Latina, Ana V. Soto, Rajesh Vedanthan, Mohamed Al-Kazaz, Chiara Giannarelli, Jason C. Kovacic, Emilia Bagiella, Andrew Kasarskis, Zahi A. Fayad, Roger J. Hajjar, Valentin Fuster |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 13 | 37% |
Spain | 8 | 23% |
Turkey | 3 | 9% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 8 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 22 | 63% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 17% |
Scientists | 5 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 198 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 10% |
Student > Master | 18 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 8% |
Researcher | 11 | 6% |
Other | 38 | 19% |
Unknown | 80 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 19% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 12% |
Sports and Recreations | 11 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 5% |
Psychology | 8 | 4% |
Other | 22 | 11% |
Unknown | 87 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2022.
All research outputs
#568,928
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,461
of 16,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,971
of 364,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#61
of 398 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 398 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.