You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Patterns of fish utilisation in a tropical Indo-Pacific mangrove-coral seascape, New Caledonia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0207168 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexia Dubuc, Nathan J. Waltham, Ronald Baker, Cyril Marchand, Marcus Sheaves |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 5 | 28% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 67% |
| Scientists | 5 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 13% |
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 15 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 16 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 24% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 18 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2019.
All research outputs
#3,150,306
of 24,145,400 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#42,086
of 207,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,954
of 354,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#676
of 2,837 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,145,400 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 207,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,837 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.