↓ Skip to main content

Othering as soft-power discursive practice: China Daily’s construction of Trump’s America in the 2016 presidential election

Overview of attention for article published in Politics, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Othering as soft-power discursive practice: China Daily’s construction of Trump’s America in the 2016 presidential election
Published in
Politics, April 2019
DOI 10.1177/0263395719843219
Authors

Chengxin Pan, Benjamin Isakhan, Zim Nwokora

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 28%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Librarian 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 13 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 15 42%
Arts and Humanities 5 14%
Linguistics 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Philosophy 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,825,820
of 24,777,509 outputs
Outputs from Politics
#112
of 662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,309
of 356,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Politics
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,777,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.