| Title |
Prospectively defined indicators to improve the safety and quality of care for critically ill patients: a report from the Task Force on Safety and Quality of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-011-2462-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. Rhodes, R. P. Moreno, E. Azoulay, M. Capuzzo, J. D. Chiche, J. Eddleston, R. Endacott, P. Ferdinande, H. Flaatten, B. Guidet, R. Kuhlen, C. León-Gil, M. C. Martin Delgado, P. G. Metnitz, M. Soares, C. L. Sprung, J. F. Timsit, A. Valentin |
| Abstract |
To define a set of indicators that could be used to improve quality in intensive care medicine. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 67% |
| Argentina | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 193 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 17% |
| Other | 29 | 14% |
| Researcher | 24 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 10% |
| Professor | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 39 | 19% |
| Unknown | 38 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 112 | 56% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Unknown | 45 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2012.
All research outputs
#6,749,644
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,691
of 4,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,343
of 246,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#12
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.