You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ethics and positionality in qualitative research with vulnerable and marginal groups
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Qualitative Research, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1177/1468794119841839 |
| Authors |
Rhonda M. Shaw, Julie Howe, Jonathan Beazer, Toni Carr |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 19% |
| Australia | 2 | 13% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 56% |
| Scientists | 5 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 235 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 12% |
| Researcher | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 38 | 16% |
| Unknown | 74 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 83 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 11 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 4% |
| Psychology | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 33 | 14% |
| Unknown | 76 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,410,449
of 25,782,917 outputs
Outputs from Qualitative Research
#161
of 721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,474
of 348,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Qualitative Research
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them