| Title |
Horizon scanning for invasive alien species with the potential to threaten biodiversity and human health on a Mediterranean island
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Invasions, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10530-019-01961-7 |
| Authors |
Jodey Peyton, Angeliki F. Martinou, Oliver L. Pescott, Monica Demetriou, Tim Adriaens, Margarita Arianoutsou, Ioannis Bazos, Colin W. Bean, Olaf Booy, Marc Botham, J. Robert Britton, Javier Lobon Cervia, Pantelis Charilaou, Niki Chartosia, Hannah J. Dean, Pinelopi Delipetrou, Andreas C. Dimitriou, Gerald Dörflinger, Jim Fawcett, Georgios Fyttis, Alexandros Galanidis, Bella Galil, Thomas Hadjikyriakou, Margarita Hadjistylli, Christina Ieronymidou, Carlos Jimenez, Paraskevi Karachle, Nikos Kassinis, George Kerametsidis, Alexander N. G. Kirschel, Periklis Kleitou, Demetris Kleitou, Paraskevi Manolaki, Nikolas Michailidis, J. Owen Mountford, Charis Nikolaou, Athina Papatheodoulou, Giorgios Payiatas, Filipe Ribeiro, Stephanie L. Rorke, Yianna Samuel, Pantelis Savvides, Stefanie M. Schafer, Ali Serhan Tarkan, Iolanda Silva-Rocha, Nildeniz Top, Elena Tricarico, Katherine Turvey, Iakovos Tziortzis, Elli Tzirkalli, Hugo Verreycken, Ian J. Winfield, Argyro Zenetos, Helen E. Roy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 18 | 51% |
| Cyprus | 2 | 6% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 69% |
| Scientists | 10 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 102 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 33 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 24% |
| Environmental Science | 19 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 40 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,477,261
of 25,463,091 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#196
of 2,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,952
of 348,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#8
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,463,091 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.