You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A retrospective cohort study comparing non-fatal self-harm emergency department visits between Canadian veterans living in Ontario and matched civilians
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Review of Psychiatry, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.1080/09540261.2019.1580685 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alyson L Mahar, Heidi Cramm, Alice B. Aiken, Marlo Whitehead, Homer Tien, Nicola T. Fear, Paul Kurdyak |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 7 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 24% |
United States | 1 | 5% |
France | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 57% |
Scientists | 6 | 29% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 18% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
Professor | 3 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 13 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 26% |
Psychology | 7 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 5% |
Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 13 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,205,624
of 23,142,049 outputs
Outputs from International Review of Psychiatry
#153
of 832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,500
of 350,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Review of Psychiatry
#6
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,142,049 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 832 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.