You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Long‐term results from a randomized comparison of open transinguinal preperitoneal hernia repair and the Lichtenstein method (TULIP trial)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Surgery, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/bjs.11178 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
W. J. V. Bökkerink, G. G. Koning, D. Malagic, L. van Hout, C. J. H. M. van Laarhoven, P. W. H. E. Vriens |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 27% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 27% |
| Scientists | 4 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 26 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 24 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,505,517
of 23,144,579 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Surgery
#1,132
of 5,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,178
of 350,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Surgery
#21
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,144,579 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.