| Title |
Conducting and interpreting fish telemetry studies: considerations for researchers and resource managers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11160-019-09560-4 |
| Authors |
Jacob W. Brownscombe, Elodie J. I. Lédée, Graham D. Raby, Daniel P. Struthers, Lee F. G. Gutowsky, Vivian M. Nguyen, Nathan Young, Michael J. W. Stokesbury, Christopher M. Holbrook, Travis O. Brenden, Christopher S. Vandergoot, Karen J. Murchie, Kim Whoriskey, Joanna Mills Flemming, Steven T. Kessel, Charles C. Krueger, Steven J. Cooke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 22% |
| Canada | 11 | 17% |
| Australia | 5 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 24 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 54% |
| Scientists | 27 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 262 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 51 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 44 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 9% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 10% |
| Unknown | 73 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 92 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 56 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Unknown | 85 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,092,225
of 25,371,292 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#46
of 639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,413
of 357,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,292 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.