Title |
Evaluation of CMIP5 twentieth century rainfall simulation over the equatorial East Africa
|
---|---|
Published in |
Theoretical and Applied Climatology, February 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00704-018-2392-x |
Authors |
Victor Ongoma, Haishan Chen, Chujie Gao |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 129 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 21 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 15% |
Researcher | 18 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
Other | 14 | 11% |
Unknown | 43 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 31 | 24% |
Environmental Science | 19 | 15% |
Engineering | 13 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
Other | 9 | 7% |
Unknown | 49 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,028,455
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Climatology
#26
of 1,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,545
of 332,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Climatology
#1
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.