↓ Skip to main content

A Comparison of Cognitive Restructuring and Thought Listing for Excessive Acquiring in Hoarding Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Therapy and Research, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
A Comparison of Cognitive Restructuring and Thought Listing for Excessive Acquiring in Hoarding Disorder
Published in
Cognitive Therapy and Research, April 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10608-019-10022-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hannah C. Levy, Randy O. Frost, Elizabeth A. Offermann, Gail Steketee, David F. Tolin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Other 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 10 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Unknown 9 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2019.
All research outputs
#6,107,914
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Therapy and Research
#304
of 953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,409
of 353,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Therapy and Research
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.