| Title |
Sequential Incisions on a Cave Bear Bone from the Middle Paleolithic of Pešturina Cave, Serbia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10816-017-9331-5 |
| Authors |
Ana Majkić, Francesco d’Errico, Stefan Milošević, Dušan Mihailović, Vesna Dimitrijević |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 19% |
| Unknown | 9 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 10 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 12% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 13 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,090,470
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
#29
of 342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,997
of 312,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.