| Title |
The effects of spacing patterns on incidental L2 vocabulary learning through reading with electronic glosses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Instructional Science, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11251-019-09483-4 |
| Authors |
Ahmet Çekiç, Arif Bakla |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Japan | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 5 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 14% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 7% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 7% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2019.
All research outputs
#6,386,184
of 23,144,579 outputs
Outputs from Instructional Science
#123
of 469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,952
of 351,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Instructional Science
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,144,579 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 469 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.