You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Socioeconomic status and risk of cardiovascular disease in 20 low-income, middle-income, and high-income countries: the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiologic (PURE) study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet Global Health, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s2214-109x(19)30045-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Annika Rosengren, Andrew Smyth, Sumathy Rangarajan, Chinthanie Ramasundarahettige, Shrikant I Bangdiwala, Khalid F AlHabib, Alvaro Avezum, Kristina Bengtsson Boström, Jephat Chifamba, Sadi Gulec, Rajeev Gupta, Ehi U Igumbor, Romaina Iqbal, Norhassim Ismail, Philip Joseph, Manmeet Kaur, Rasha Khatib, Iolanthé M Kruger, Pablo Lamelas, Fernando Lanas, Scott A Lear, Wei Li, Chuangshi Wang, Deren Quiang, Yang Wang, Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo, Noushin Mohammadifard, Viswanathan Mohan, Prem K Mony, Paul Poirier, Sarojiniamma Srilatha, Andrzej Szuba, Koon Teo, Andreas Wielgosz, Karen E Yeates, Khalid Yusoff, Rita Yusuf, Afzalhusein H Yusufali, Marjan W Attaei, Martin McKee, Salim Yusuf |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 120 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 8% |
| Argentina | 6 | 5% |
| Canada | 5 | 4% |
| Brazil | 4 | 3% |
| Mongolia | 4 | 3% |
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 44 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 74 | 62% |
| Scientists | 25 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 667 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 667 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 84 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 68 | 10% |
| Researcher | 52 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 49 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 7% |
| Other | 129 | 19% |
| Unknown | 239 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 158 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 71 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 38 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 2% |
| Other | 105 | 16% |
| Unknown | 261 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 134. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2021.
All research outputs
#315,265
of 25,755,403 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Global Health
#272
of 3,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,668
of 364,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Global Health
#6
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,755,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.