↓ Skip to main content

De novo variants in FBXO11 cause a syndromic form of intellectual disability with behavioral problems and dysmorphisms

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Human Genetics, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
De novo variants in FBXO11 cause a syndromic form of intellectual disability with behavioral problems and dysmorphisms
Published in
European Journal of Human Genetics, January 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41431-018-0292-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra Jansen, Ilse M. van der Werf, A. Micheil Innes, Alexandra Afenjar, Pankaj B. Agrawal, Ilse J. Anderson, Paldeep S. Atwal, Ellen van Binsbergen, Marie-José van den Boogaard, Lucia Castiglia, Zeynep H. Coban-Akdemir, Anke van Dijck, Diane Doummar, Albertien M. van Eerde, Anthonie J. van Essen, Koen L. van Gassen, Maria J. Guillen Sacoto, Mieke M. van Haelst, Ivan Iossifov, Jessica L. Jackson, Elizabeth Judd, Charu Kaiwar, Boris Keren, Eric W. Klee, Jolien S. Klein Wassink-Ruiter, Marije E. Meuwissen, Kristin G. Monaghan, Sonja A. de Munnik, Caroline Nava, Charlotte W. Ockeloen, Rosa Pettinato, Hilary Racher, Tuula Rinne, Corrado Romano, Victoria R. Sanders, Rhonda E. Schnur, Eric J. Smeets, Alexander P. A. Stegmann, Asbjørg Stray-Pedersen, David A. Sweetser, Paulien A. Terhal, Kristian Tveten, Grace E. VanNoy, Petra F. de Vries, Jessica L. Waxler, Marcia Willing, Rolph Pfundt, Joris A. Veltman, R. Frank Kooy, Lisenka E. L. M. Vissers, Bert B. A. de Vries

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 24 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 13%
Neuroscience 8 11%
Psychology 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 28 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2019.
All research outputs
#12,831,711
of 23,144,579 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Human Genetics
#2,436
of 3,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,097
of 437,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Human Genetics
#59
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,144,579 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.