You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A coarse-grained red blood cell membrane model to study stomatocyte-discocyte-echinocyte morphologies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0215447 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nadeeshani Maheshika Geekiyanage, Marie Anne Balanant, Emilie Sauret, Suvash Saha, Robert Flower, Chwee Teck Lim, YuanTong Gu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 25% |
| Austria | 1 | 13% |
| Norway | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 81 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 21% |
| Researcher | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 23 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 16 | 20% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 20% |
| Unknown | 28 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2019.
All research outputs
#6,535,605
of 23,301,510 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#80,749
of 199,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,449
of 350,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,134
of 2,822 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,301,510 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,822 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.