↓ Skip to main content

Cosmic radiation and cancer mortality among airline pilots: results from a European cohort study (ESCAPE)

Overview of attention for article published in Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, November 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 463)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Cosmic radiation and cancer mortality among airline pilots: results from a European cohort study (ESCAPE)
Published in
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, November 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00411-003-0214-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

I. Langner, M. Blettner, M. Gundestrup, H. Storm, R. Aspholm, A. Auvinen, E. Pukkala, G. P. Hammer, H. Zeeb, J. Hrafnkelsson, V. Rafnsson, H. Tulinius, G. De Angelis, A. Verdecchia, T. Haldorsen, U. Tveten, H. Eliasch†, N. Hammar, A. Linnersjö

Abstract

Cosmic radiation is an occupational risk factor for commercial aircrews. In this large European cohort study (ESCAPE) its association with cancer mortality was investigated on the basis of individual effective dose estimates for 19,184 male pilots. Mean annual doses were in the range of 2-5 mSv and cumulative lifetime doses did not exceed 80 mSv. All-cause and all-cancer mortality was low for all exposure categories. A significant negative risk trend for all-cause mortality was seen with increasing dose. Neither external and internal comparisons nor nested case-control analyses showed any substantially increased risks for cancer mortality due to ionizing radiation. However, the number of deaths for specific types of cancer was low and the confidence intervals of the risk estimates were rather wide. Difficulties in interpreting mortality risk estimates for time-dependent exposures are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 4%
Japan 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 45 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 18%
Professor 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 27%
Engineering 5 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Physics and Astronomy 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 13 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,076,089
of 24,643,522 outputs
Outputs from Radiation and Environmental Biophysics
#12
of 463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,534
of 139,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation and Environmental Biophysics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,643,522 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 463 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them