You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Patient-Held Active Record of Medication Status (PHARMS) study: a mixed-methods feasibility analysis.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp19x702413 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elaine K Walsh, Laura J Sahm, Colin P Bradley, Kieran Dalton, Kathleen O'Sullivan, Stephen McCarthy, Eimear Connolly, Ciara Fitzgerald, William H Smithson, David Kerins, Derina Byrne, Patricia M Kearney |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 8 | 67% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 92% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 26 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 19% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 26 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,328,134
of 23,144,579 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#658
of 4,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,948
of 349,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#20
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,144,579 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.