Title |
Anatomy of cascading natural disasters in Japan: main modes and linkages
|
---|---|
Published in |
Natural Hazards, October 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11069-015-2028-8 |
Authors |
Mieko Kumasaki, Malcolm King, Mitsuru Arai, Lili Yang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 26% |
Researcher | 9 | 15% |
Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 11% |
Unknown | 14 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 13 | 21% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 11% |
Environmental Science | 6 | 10% |
Decision Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Unknown | 19 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2020.
All research outputs
#721,891
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#53
of 1,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,049
of 283,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#1
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.