You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Applying Policy Process Theories to Environmental Governance Research: Themes and New Directions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Policy Studies Journal, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1111/psj.12317 |
| Authors |
Tatyana Ruseva, Megan Foster, Gwen Arnold, Saba Siddiki, Abigail York, Riley Pudney, Ziqiao Chen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 48% |
| Canada | 2 | 10% |
| Philippines | 1 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 11 | 52% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 102 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
| Researcher | 8 | 8% |
| Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 26 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 34 | 33% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 16% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 29 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2019.
All research outputs
#3,078,767
of 24,689,476 outputs
Outputs from Policy Studies Journal
#159
of 711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,940
of 355,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Policy Studies Journal
#9
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,689,476 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.