| Title |
Kidney Transplant Evaluation: Inferences from Qualitative Interviews with African American Patients and their Providers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40615-019-00592-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Natalia Crenesse-Cozien, Beth Dolph, Meriem Said, Thomas H. Feeley, Liise K. Kayler |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 15 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 7 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 16 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2019.
All research outputs
#5,729,008
of 23,144,579 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
#469
of 1,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,035
of 350,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
#7
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,144,579 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.