↓ Skip to main content

Randomness is problematic for social science research purposes

Overview of attention for article published in Quality & Quantity, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
Title
Randomness is problematic for social science research purposes
Published in
Quality & Quantity, December 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11135-018-0824-4
Authors

Merton S. Krause

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 195 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 30%
Student > Master 17 9%
Lecturer 17 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 51 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 64 33%
Social Sciences 25 13%
Computer Science 11 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 4%
Arts and Humanities 7 4%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 60 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2019.
All research outputs
#13,195,041
of 23,605,418 outputs
Outputs from Quality & Quantity
#298
of 633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,317
of 439,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality & Quantity
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,605,418 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 633 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.