| Title |
World Subterranean Heritage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Geoheritage, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12371-019-00351-8 |
| Authors |
E. Trofimova, A. Trofimov |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 20% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 40% |
| Psychology | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,341,480
of 23,144,579 outputs
Outputs from Geoheritage
#72
of 439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,714
of 349,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geoheritage
#6
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,144,579 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 439 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.