↓ Skip to main content

Direction selectivity in the retina: symmetry and asymmetry in structure and function

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Neuroscience, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
273 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
445 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Direction selectivity in the retina: symmetry and asymmetry in structure and function
Published in
Nature Reviews Neuroscience, February 2012
DOI 10.1038/nrn3165
Pubmed ID
Authors

David I. Vaney, Benjamin Sivyer, W. Rowland Taylor

Abstract

Visual information is processed in the retina to a remarkable degree before it is transmitted to higher visual centres. Several types of retinal ganglion cells (the output neurons of the retina) respond preferentially to image motion in a particular direction, and each type of direction-selective ganglion cell (DSGC) is comprised of multiple subtypes with different preferred directions. The direction selectivity of the cells is generated by diverse mechanisms operating within microcircuits that rely on independent neuronal processing in individual dendrites of both the DSGCs and the presynaptic neurons that innervate them.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 445 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 2%
Germany 5 1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 415 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 138 31%
Researcher 89 20%
Student > Master 42 9%
Student > Bachelor 36 8%
Professor 26 6%
Other 70 16%
Unknown 44 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 175 39%
Neuroscience 110 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 5%
Engineering 23 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 3%
Other 47 11%
Unknown 51 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2021.
All research outputs
#6,245,187
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Neuroscience
#1,621
of 2,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,450
of 247,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Neuroscience
#19
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.