| Title |
Responses of carbonic anhydrases and Rubisco to abrupt CO2 changes of seawater in two marine diatoms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11356-019-05101-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiaopeng Zeng, Peng Jin, Dinghui Zou, Yuxian Liu, Jianrong Xia |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 38% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 7 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 14% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2019.
All research outputs
#6,029,485
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#1,101
of 9,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,696
of 355,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#29
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,883 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.