| Title |
Socio-economic disparities in mortality due to pandemic influenza in England
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Public Health, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00038-012-0337-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul D. Rutter, Oliver T. Mytton, Matthew Mak, Liam J. Donaldson |
| Abstract |
This study examines variations in mortality between socio-economic groups due to the pandemic Influenza (H1N1) 2009 virus in England. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 95 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 15% |
| Researcher | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 29 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 8% |
| Psychology | 5 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 38 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#795,583
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Public Health
#63
of 1,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,622
of 253,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Public Health
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.