↓ Skip to main content

Sponge bioerosion versus aqueous pCO2: morphometric assessment of chips and etching fissures

Overview of attention for article published in Facies, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 157)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Sponge bioerosion versus aqueous pCO2: morphometric assessment of chips and etching fissures
Published in
Facies, April 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10347-019-0558-3
Authors

Neele Meyer, Max Wisshak, Christine H. L. Schönberg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 23%
Researcher 5 23%
Student > Master 4 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 36%
Environmental Science 4 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 4 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2019.
All research outputs
#3,070,361
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Facies
#6
of 157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,214
of 351,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Facies
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them