↓ Skip to main content

The Epidemiology of Finding a Dead Body: Reports from Inner-City Baltimore, Maryland US

Overview of attention for article published in Community Mental Health Journal, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
The Epidemiology of Finding a Dead Body: Reports from Inner-City Baltimore, Maryland US
Published in
Community Mental Health Journal, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10597-012-9492-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carl Latkin, Cui Yang, Britt Ehrhardt, Alicia Hulbert

Abstract

In the US, there are no national statistics on encountering a dead body, which can be viewed as a measure of community health and a stressful life event. Participants for an HIV prevention intervention targeting drug users were recruited in areas of inner-city Baltimore, Maryland. Nine hundred and fifty-one respondents, most with a history of drug use, were asked "have you ever found a dead body?" and 17.0% reported they had. Leading causes of death were: violence (37%), natural causes (22.2%), drug overdose (21.6%), accidental death (3.1%), and suicide (2.5%). In multivariate logistic models, respondents with longer history of drug use and more roles in a drug economy were more likely to be exposed to a dead body. The study results suggest that this population has a high level of experiences with mortality associated with violence and drugs. To obtain a better understanding of community health, future studies should assess not only morbidity and mortality, but also how death and illness is experienced by the community.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 48 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 27%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Researcher 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 20%
Psychology 9 18%
Social Sciences 9 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 9 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2022.
All research outputs
#15,789,142
of 23,454,152 outputs
Outputs from Community Mental Health Journal
#847
of 1,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,924
of 250,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Community Mental Health Journal
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,454,152 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.