↓ Skip to main content

Hierarchical topological network analysis of anatomical human brain connectivity and differences related to sex and kinship

Overview of attention for article published in NeuroImage, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hierarchical topological network analysis of anatomical human brain connectivity and differences related to sex and kinship
Published in
NeuroImage, November 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.096
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julio M. Duarte-Carvajalino, Neda Jahanshad, Christophe Lenglet, Katie L. McMahon, Greig I. de Zubicaray, Nicholas G. Martin, Margaret J. Wright, Paul M. Thompson, Guillermo Sapiro

Abstract

Modern non-invasive brain imaging technologies, such as diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI), enable the mapping of neural fiber tracts in the white matter, providing a basis to reconstruct a detailed map of brain structural connectivity networks. Brain connectivity networks differ from random networks in their topology, which can be measured using small worldness, modularity, and high-degree nodes (hubs). Still, little is known about how individual differences in structural brain network properties relate to age, sex, or genetic differences. Recently, some groups have reported brain network biomarkers that enable differentiation among individuals, pairs of individuals, and groups of individuals. In addition to studying new topological features, here we provide a unifying general method to investigate topological brain networks and connectivity differences between individuals, pairs of individuals, and groups of individuals at several levels of the data hierarchy, while appropriately controlling false discovery rate (FDR) errors. We apply our new method to a large dataset of high quality brain connectivity networks obtained from High Angular Resolution Diffusion Imaging (HARDI) tractography in 303 young adult twins, siblings, and unrelated people. Our proposed approach can accurately classify brain connectivity networks based on sex (93% accuracy) and kinship (88.5% accuracy). We find statistically significant differences associated with sex and kinship both in the brain connectivity networks and in derived topological metrics, such as the clustering coefficient and the communicability matrix.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 5%
Finland 2 2%
Netherlands 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Russia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 111 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 20%
Student > Master 11 9%
Professor 10 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 21 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 22 17%
Psychology 19 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 13%
Computer Science 14 11%
Engineering 12 9%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 25 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,217,259
of 25,408,670 outputs
Outputs from NeuroImage
#5,778
of 12,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,660
of 153,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroImage
#62
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,408,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.