You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Breathe Easier Online: Evaluation of a Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial of an Internet-Based Intervention to Improve Well-being in Children and Adolescents With a Chronic Respiratory Condition
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Internet Research, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2196/jmir.1997 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter A Newcombe, Tamara L Dunn, Leanne M Casey, Jeanie K Sheffield, Helen Petsky, Sophie Anderson-James, Anne B Chang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 216 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 16% |
| Researcher | 28 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 9% |
| Other | 35 | 16% |
| Unknown | 54 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 68 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Unknown | 67 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2012.
All research outputs
#8,880,246
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#5,268
of 7,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,666
of 260,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#44
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.