↓ Skip to main content

Routine Prenatal HIV Testing: Women’s Concerns and Their Strategies for Addressing Concerns

Overview of attention for article published in Maternal and Child Health Journal, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Routine Prenatal HIV Testing: Women’s Concerns and Their Strategies for Addressing Concerns
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal, February 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10995-011-0754-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pamela Rothpletz-Puglia, Deborah Storm, Carolyn Burr, Deanne Samuels

Abstract

The purpose of this exploratory study was to solicit women's opinions about the process of routine prenatal HIV testing to identify strategies for routine testing that will address women's concerns, increase their level of comfort with testing, and support universal prenatal HIV testing. A convenience sample of English-speaking women between 18 and 45 years of age who were HIV-negative or of unknown HIV status were recruited for focus groups at four diverse community sites in four states. Focus group discussion questions addressed health care provider approaches and actions that would make a woman feel more comfortable with the process of routine prenatal HIV testing. Twenty-five women agreed to participate; most women (64%) were of Black, non-Hispanic race/ethnicity; 44% were 25-34 years of age. Thematic analysis of women's concerns about routine prenatal HIV testing fell into the following categories: fear, protecting the baby, protecting the woman, confidentiality, and stigma. Women's strategies for addressing these concerns were related to themes of education and information, normalizing HIV testing, patient-provider relationships, systems, and private communication. Participants offered numerous insightful and practical suggestions for addressing their concerns thereby supporting universal routine prenatal HIV testing. The themes that arose in this study support the conclusion that women will be more comfortable with routine prenatal HIV testing if they are fully informed and knowledgeable about the rationale for HIV testing during pregnancy and their right to decline, and if testing is carried out in a confidential and supportive health care environment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ghana 1 1%
Unknown 68 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 19%
Researcher 12 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 13 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 19%
Social Sciences 8 12%
Psychology 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 17 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2018.
All research outputs
#6,838,548
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#671
of 2,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,012
of 189,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.