Title |
Effects of 12 Weeks of Essential Amino Acids (EAA)-Based Multi-Ingredient Nutritional Supplementation on Muscle Mass, Muscle Strength, Muscle Power and Fatigue in Healthy Elderly Subjects: A Randomized Controlled Double-Blind Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
The journal of nutrition, health & aging, May 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12603-019-1163-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
M. Negro, S. Perna, D. Spadaccini, L. Castelli, L. Calanni, M. Barbero, C. Cescon, M. Rondanelli, Giuseppe D’Antona |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 29% |
Australia | 3 | 14% |
France | 2 | 10% |
Canada | 2 | 10% |
Brazil | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 6 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 62% |
Scientists | 5 | 24% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 143 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 25 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 6% |
Researcher | 7 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 3% |
Other | 15 | 10% |
Unknown | 68 | 48% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 10% |
Sports and Recreations | 13 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
Other | 14 | 10% |
Unknown | 78 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,382,608
of 25,600,774 outputs
Outputs from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#440
of 1,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,231
of 363,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#14
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,600,774 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,990 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.