↓ Skip to main content

Cytomegalovirus infection and coronary heart disease risk: a meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Biology Reports, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Cytomegalovirus infection and coronary heart disease risk: a meta-analysis
Published in
Molecular Biology Reports, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11033-012-1482-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ya-Nan Ji, Li An, Ping Zhan, Xiao-Hu Chen

Abstract

The chronic inflammatory process including cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection has been hypothesized to induce the progression of atherosclerosis in coronary heart disease (CHD). Numbers studies were conducted to analyze the association between CMV infection and risk of CHD, but no clear consensus had been reached. To assess this relationship more precisely, a meta-analysis was performed. The electronic databases PubMed, Embase, and CNKI were searched; data were extracted and analyzed independently by two investigators. Ultimately, 55 studies, involving 9,000 cases and 8,608 controls from six prospective studies (all with a nested case-control design) and 49 retrospective case-control studies were included. Overall, people exposed to CMV infection had an odds ratio (OR) of 1.67 (95% CI, 1.56-1.79) for CHD risk, relative to those not exposed. CMV infection was clearly identified as a risk factor for CHD in both prospective studies (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.132-1.517) and retrospective studies (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.659-1.939), and in both Asian group (OR, 2.69; 95% CI, 2.304-3.144) and non-Asian group (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.371-1.600). Interestingly, in the subgroup analyses by detection methods of CMV, the increased risk (OR, 8.121) was greater among studies using polymerase chain reaction than the risk (OR, 1.561) among studies using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggested that CMV infection is associated with an increased risk for CHD, especially among Asian populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
Colombia 1 2%
Unknown 46 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 18%
Student > Bachelor 9 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Student > Master 7 14%
Other 3 6%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 9 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2018.
All research outputs
#7,412,654
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Biology Reports
#387
of 2,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,940
of 247,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Biology Reports
#10
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,873 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.