You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lung Cancer Risk in Never-Smokers of European Descent is Associated With Genetic Variation in the 5p15.33 TERT-CLPTM1Ll Region
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Thoracic Oncology, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.04.008 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rayjean J Hung, Margaret R Spitz, Richard S Houlston, Ann G Schwartz, John K Field, Jun Ying, Yafang Li, Younghun Han, Xuemei Ji, Wei Chen, Xifeng Wu, Ivan P Gorlov, Jie Na, Mariza de Andrade, Geoffrey Liu, Yonathan Brhane, Nancy Diao, Angela Wenzlaff, Michael P A Davies, Triantafillos Liloglou, Maria Timofeeva, Thomas Muley, Hedy Rennert, Walid Saliba, Bríd M Ryan, Elise Bowman, Juan-Miguel Barros-Dios, Mónica Pérez-Ríos, Hal Morgenstern, Shanbeh Zienolddiny, Vidar Skaug, Donatella Ugolini, Stefano Bonassi, Erik H F M van der Heijden, Adonina Tardon, Stig E Bojesen, Maria Teresa Landi, Mattias Johansson, Heike Bickeböller, Susanne Arnold, Loic Le Marchand, Olle Melander, Angeline Andrew, Kjell Grankvist, Neil Caporaso, M Dawn Teare, Matthew B Schabath, Melinda C Aldrich, Lambertus A Kiemeney, H-Erich Wichmann, Philip Lazarus, Jose Mayordomo, Monica Neri, Aage Haugen, Zuo-Feng Zhang, Alberto Ruano-Raviña, Hermann Brenner, Curtis C Harris, Irene Orlow, Gadi Rennert, Angela Risch, Paul Brennan, David C Christiani, Christopher I Amos, Ping Yang, Olga Y Gorlova |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 27 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 33 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2019.
All research outputs
#16,053,755
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thoracic Oncology
#2,018
of 3,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,660
of 364,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thoracic Oncology
#29
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.