| Title |
Comparing the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of sampling methods for estimating population abundance and density of a recovering carnivore: the European pine marten (Martes martes)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Wildlife Research, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10344-019-1282-6 |
| Authors |
Elizabeth Croose, Johnny D. S. Birks, John Martin, Gareth Ventress, Jenny MacPherson, Catherine O’Reilly |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 16% |
| Ireland | 3 | 12% |
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Portugal | 1 | 4% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 52% |
| Scientists | 8 | 32% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 16% |
| Researcher | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 47% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 15 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,270,779
of 25,301,208 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#99
of 1,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,115
of 357,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,301,208 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,029 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.