| Title |
The landscape of natural product diversity and their pharmacological relevance from a focus on the Dictionary of Natural Products®
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Phytochemistry Reviews, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11101-019-09606-2 |
| Authors |
François Chassagne, Guillaume Cabanac, Gilles Hubert, Bruno David, Guillaume Marti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 60% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 112 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 14% |
| Researcher | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 38 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 16% |
| Chemistry | 15 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 39 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,341,480
of 23,144,579 outputs
Outputs from Phytochemistry Reviews
#138
of 337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,980
of 350,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Phytochemistry Reviews
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,144,579 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 337 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them