| Title |
Lumbar segmental instability: a criterion-related validity study of manual therapy assessment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-6-56 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J Haxby Abbott, Brendan McCane, Peter Herbison, Graeme Moginie, Cathy Chapple, Tracy Hogarty |
| Abstract |
Musculoskeletal physiotherapists routinely assess lumbar segmental motion during the clinical examination of a patient with low back pain. The validity of manual assessment of segmental motion has not, however, been adequately investigated. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 17% |
| South Africa | 2 | 11% |
| Brazil | 2 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 61% |
| Scientists | 4 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 309 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 294 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 58 | 19% |
| Other | 39 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 32 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 10% |
| Researcher | 27 | 9% |
| Other | 87 | 28% |
| Unknown | 34 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 144 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 63 | 20% |
| Sports and Recreations | 14 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Engineering | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 30 | 10% |
| Unknown | 41 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,915,340
of 25,466,764 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#352
of 4,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,236
of 77,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,466,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.