↓ Skip to main content

Doripenem versus meropenem as first-line empiric therapy of febrile neutropenia in patients with acute leukemia: a prospective, randomized study

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Hematology, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Doripenem versus meropenem as first-line empiric therapy of febrile neutropenia in patients with acute leukemia: a prospective, randomized study
Published in
Annals of Hematology, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00277-019-03634-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tatsuo Oyake, Yuka Takemasa-Fujisawa, Norifumi Sugawara, Takahiro Mine, Yasuhiko Tsukushi, Ichiro Hanamura, Yukiteru Fujishima, Yusei Aoki, Shugo Kowata, Shigeki Ito, Yoji Ishida

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Other 2 9%
Professor 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 30%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 9%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Unknown 12 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2019.
All research outputs
#18,679,530
of 23,144,579 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Hematology
#1,493
of 2,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,406
of 354,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Hematology
#30
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,144,579 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,211 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.