You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Methodologic considerations for measuring energy expenditure differences between diets varying in carbohydrate using the doubly labeled water method
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1093/ajcn/nqy390 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kevin D Hall, Juen Guo, Kong Y Chen, Rudolph L Leibel, Marc L Reitman, Michael Rosenbaum, Steven R Smith, Eric Ravussin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 14% |
| Sweden | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 31 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 28% |
| Scientists | 17 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 28 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 13% |
| Sports and Recreations | 10 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 31 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2023.
All research outputs
#974,616
of 25,661,882 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#1,905
of 12,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,721
of 364,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#24
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,661,882 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,227 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.