You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Scientific networks on Twitter: Analyzing scientists’ interactions in the climate change debate
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Public Understanding of Science, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1177/0963662519844131 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stefanie Walter, Ines Lörcher, Michael Brüggemann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 11% |
| Germany | 6 | 11% |
| Italy | 3 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 6% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Chile | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Austria | 2 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 55% |
| Scientists | 21 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 149 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 15% |
| Researcher | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 42 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 46 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 32 | 21% |
| Unknown | 50 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,196,667
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Public Understanding of Science
#138
of 1,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,067
of 363,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Understanding of Science
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.