You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Economic evaluation of California prenatal participation in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) to prevent preterm birth
|
---|---|
Published in |
Preventive Medicine, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.04.011 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Roch A Nianogo, May C Wang, Ricardo Basurto-Davila, Tabashir Z Nobari, Michael Prelip, Onyebuchi A Arah, Shannon E Whaley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 54 | 64% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Ireland | 1 | 1% |
Pakistan | 1 | 1% |
Georgia | 1 | 1% |
Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
India | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 23 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 62 | 74% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 18% |
Scientists | 7 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 14 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
Researcher | 6 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
Other | 14 | 18% |
Unknown | 25 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 8% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
Other | 11 | 14% |
Unknown | 29 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 90. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#480,671
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Preventive Medicine
#247
of 5,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,256
of 348,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Preventive Medicine
#7
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.