You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Anatomical and functional investigation of the marmoset default mode network
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-09813-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cirong Liu, Cecil Chern-Chyi Yen, Diego Szczupak, Frank Q. Ye, David A. Leopold, Afonso C. Silva |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 4 | 21% |
| United States | 3 | 16% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 53% |
| Scientists | 7 | 37% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 25% |
| Researcher | 20 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 15 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 35 | 42% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 20 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2019.
All research outputs
#4,275,618
of 24,998,746 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#35,285
of 54,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,857
of 356,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#916
of 1,331 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,998,746 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 54,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,331 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.