| Title |
Bucindolol for the Maintenance of Sinus Rhythm in a Genotype-Defined HF Population The GENETIC-AF Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Heart Failure, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.04.004 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan P. Piccini, William T. Abraham, Christopher Dufton, Ian A. Carroll, Jeff S. Healey, Dirk J. van Veldhuisen, William H. Sauer, Inder S. Anand, Michel White, Stephen B. Wilton, Ryan Aleong, Michiel Rienstra, Steven K. Krueger, Felix Ayala-Paredes, Yaariv Khaykin, Bela Merkely, Vladimir Miloradović, Jerzy K. Wranicz, Leonard Ilkhanoff, Paul D. Ziegler, Gordon Davis, Laura L. Emery, Debra Marshall, David P. Kao, Michael R. Bristow, Stuart J. Connolly, GENETIC-AF Trial Investigators |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 35% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Turkey | 1 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Romania | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 14 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 55% |
| Scientists | 13 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 23% |
| Unknown | 16 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 35% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Psychology | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 21 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2020.
All research outputs
#567,083
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Heart Failure
#148
of 1,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,570
of 364,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Heart Failure
#4
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.