You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The genetic history of admixture across inner Eurasia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Ecology & Evolution, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41559-019-0878-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Choongwon Jeong, Oleg Balanovsky, Elena Lukianova, Nurzhibek Kahbatkyzy, Pavel Flegontov, Valery Zaporozhchenko, Alexander Immel, Chuan-Chao Wang, Olzhas Ixan, Elmira Khussainova, Bakhytzhan Bekmanov, Victor Zaibert, Maria Lavryashina, Elvira Pocheshkhova, Yuldash Yusupov, Anastasiya Agdzhoyan, Sergey Koshel, Andrei Bukin, Pagbajabyn Nymadawa, Shahlo Turdikulova, Dilbar Dalimova, Mikhail Churnosov, Roza Skhalyakho, Denis Daragan, Yuri Bogunov, Anna Bogunova, Alexandr Shtrunov, Nadezhda Dubova, Maxat Zhabagin, Levon Yepiskoposyan, Vladimir Churakov, Nikolay Pislegin, Larissa Damba, Ludmila Saroyants, Khadizhat Dibirova, Lubov Atramentova, Olga Utevska, Eldar Idrisov, Evgeniya Kamenshchikova, Irina Evseeva, Mait Metspalu, Alan K. Outram, Martine Robbeets, Leyla Djansugurova, Elena Balanovska, Stephan Schiffels, Wolfgang Haak, David Reich, Johannes Krause |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 12% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Estonia | 2 | 4% |
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 23 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 75% |
| Scientists | 12 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 161 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 20% |
| Researcher | 27 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 14% |
| Unknown | 48 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 43 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 22% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 53 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 119. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#358,719
of 25,722,279 outputs
Outputs from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#673
of 2,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,632
of 364,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#26
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,722,279 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 149.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.