You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chlamydia pecorum prevalence in South Australian koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) populations: Identification and modelling of a population free from infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-42702-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jessica Fabijan, Charles Caraguel, Martina Jelocnik, Adam Polkinghorne, Wayne S. J. Boardman, Elisa Nishimoto, Greg Johnsson, Robyn Molsher, Lucy Woolford, Peter Timms, Greg Simmons, Farhid Hemmatzadeh, Darren J. Trott, Natasha Speight |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 25% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 88% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 15% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 10 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 269. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2023.
All research outputs
#124,554
of 24,247,965 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#1,513
of 131,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,566
of 354,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#47
of 3,602 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,247,965 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 131,727 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,602 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.