You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The associations of anthropometric, behavioural and sociodemographic factors with circulating concentrations of IGF‐I, IGF‐II, IGFBP‐1, IGFBP‐2 and IGFBP‐3 in a pooled analysis of 16,024 men from 22 studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Cancer, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ijc.32276 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eleanor L. Watts, Aurora Perez‐Cornago, Paul N. Appleby, Demetrius Albanes, Eva Ardanaz, Amanda Black, H. Bas Bueno‐de‐Mesquita, June M. Chan, Chu Chen, S.A. Paul Chubb, Michael B. Cook, Mélanie Deschasaux, Jenny L. Donovan, Dallas R. English, Leon Flicker, Neal D. Freedman, Pilar Galan, Graham G. Giles, Edward L. Giovannucci, Marc J. Gunter, Laurel A. Habel, Christel Häggström, Christopher Haiman, Freddie C. Hamdy, Serge Hercberg, Jeff M. Holly, Jiaqi Huang, Wen‐Yi Huang, Mattias Johansson, Rudolf Kaaks, Tatsuhiko Kubo, J. Athene Lane, Tracy M. Layne, Loic Le Marchand, Richard M. Martin, E. Jeffrey Metter, Kazuya Mikami, Roger L. Milne, Howard A. Morris, Lorelei A. Mucci, David E. Neal, Marian L. Neuhouser, Steven E. Oliver, Kim Overvad, Kotaro Ozasa, Valeria Pala, Claire H. Pernar, Michael Pollak, Mari‐Anne Rowlands, Catherine A. Schaefer, Jeannette M. Schenk, Pär Stattin, Akiko Tamakoshi, Elin Thysell, Mathilde Touvier, Antonia Trichopoulou, Konstantinos K. Tsilidis, Stephen K. Van Den Eeden, Stephanie J. Weinstein, Lynne Wilkens, Bu B. Yeap, Timothy J. Key, Naomi E. Allen, Ruth C. Travis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| France | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 11 | 17% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 20 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 25 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2019.
All research outputs
#13,164,785
of 23,306,612 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Cancer
#8,988
of 11,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,001
of 352,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Cancer
#64
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,306,612 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,831 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.